Showing posts with label sexuality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sexuality. Show all posts

Thursday, October 14, 2010

"The Mean Girls of Morehouse": Gender at Same-sex Colleges


A recent vibe article entitled "The Mean Girls of Morehouse" focuses on a group (self-named "Plastics") who are current and former students at Morehouse - an all male historically black college in Atlanta, but whom have felt stifled at the overt criticism of their lifestyle. The group often cross-dresses, wears makeup and takes female hormones. And, while I don't agree with Morehouse defining what a man is and what a man is not, I am hesitant to say that these students belong there.

Simply put, women do not belong at Morehouse.

In the same vein, I don't believe men belong at all-women's colleges like Spelman or Barnard, for example. But, let me be a little more specific: I recognize the difference between gender and sex. Gender is self-identification -- do you identify as a man or a woman? Sex is physically identified. So, the Morehouse Plastics are male in terms of sex and what in terms of gender?
“I’ve always been into clothes, shoes, hair and everything,” says Diamond, who was born and raised in Providence, R.I. He says there’s a good chance he’ll transition into a woman at some point. “My mother says I always played dress-up in her clothes, my grandmother’s clothes. I’d even get my brother to do it sometimes. That’s just always been me—pushing the envelope of what I’m supposed to be as a man.”

So does Diamond really consider herself a man? At the question, he groans. “Yes, I refer to myself as a man, you know, to relieve any confusion. Sometimes people don’t understand the whole androgyny thing. There’s always the question: Well, what are you? Yes, I’m a man. I like women’s clothes. And yeah, I’m gay. But I don’t want that to define me. How come people can’t just see me as a person?”
What's problematic is both Diamond and the author can't seem to make up their mind as to Diamond's gender. The author uses both female and male pronouns to describe Diamond; and, Diamond declares himself a man, but add the qualifier ("to relieve any confusion") and talks about eventually transitioning to a woman. 

And, Diamond really doesn't have to choose which gender he/she is... unless he/she has expressly placed himself in an environment in which is predicated upon him being gendered as a man. 
Same-sex colleges are special places designed to help men and women achieve in environments designed to help them thrive. Morehouse is an all-male college. So, unless Diamond truly sees himself as a man, he shouldn't be there. There are plenty of colleges where the questioning of his gendered identity would be more acceptable, but at a same-sex college it becomes contentious. Diamond, if she identifies as a woman, misidentified herself and lied in order to insert herself into the college. If, she entered as a man, then when she decided not to be a man anymore she should have withdrawn or at least consulted with someone at the college. However, if Diamond is resolute in his identity as a male, then he belongs there as much as anyone does.

One last thing, this is not a gay/straight issue. This has nothing to do with sexuality. It has to do with gender.

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

the objectification of gay men


in belated honor of national coming out day and in celebration of the federal judge who today made "don't ask don't tell" illegal, a subject on sexuality. so, this blog post was supposed to be about the objectification gay men by straight women codified as "he's my gay best friend!" it's something that's irked me for a while. it seems that no matter how many friends a girl might have, their arsenal isn't complete until one of them is gay (and male - no lesbians allowed!). and he can't just be your gay friend, but he needs to be your best friend. it's an oversimplification and stereotypical way of viewing gay men. the gay best friend is supposed to be basically what your friends are: catty, into clothes, into boys and validating.

but i say supposed to because when i was researching some information for the post, i ran into this post on Salon from a couple of months ago called, "gay best-friend: the 'it' accessory" needless to say, i was dissappointed. it's an interesting read; i like how she describes the gay best friend "as that new knight in shining armor: the mystical, magical gay boy who'll always have your back" -- it's remiscent as the "magical negro" (google search spike lee magical negro if you don't get that one).

the only thing i would add is that many gay men are complicit in this objectification. they act out the stereotype to adhere to the idealized "gay best friend." i'm not going so far as to say that gay men like to be stereotyped, but i am saying that it is highly problematic that they choose to play into this role. speaking to one of my gay male friends, he acknowledged the role that many gay men play and said it was theatrical and truly acting - a sort of turning on for a specific audience. this, however, does nothing to help the community in fostering images that combat the (idealized?) simplified stereotype of what it means to be gay. not cool, guys.

thoughts/comments?